“Women in Combat” Supported by 95% of Divorced Men – News Makeup

Women in Combat” Supported by 95% of Divorced Men

Written by Stan Sinberg 29th January 2013

(Photo Credit: Shutterstock)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — A new survey reveals that the recent decision by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta allowing women in the military to be sent into combat has the support of 95% of recently divorced men.

“Hell, air max 90 pas cher Detroit Pistons

yeah,” Greg Jarslag nodded, asics homme between knocking back brewskis at The Stool, Georgetown Hoyas Nike Air Max 1 Heren groen

a hole-in-the-wall bar in Toledo, new balance 1400 femme

Ohio. nike scarpe 2017 Under Armour Shoes “Definitely.

asics scarpe bimbo Asics Gel Lyte 5 Pas Cher Send ‘em all over there.”

According to Gallup poll, AIR MAX 2017 MUJER

Colt McCoy – Texas Longhorns 78% percent of recently divorced men favored putting women on the frontlines “tomorrow,” even if the U.S. asics onitsuka tiger mujer wasn’t currently engaged in a military conflict.

“Not having anything to argue about never stopped my wife from fighting before,” chimed in Hank Paisley, Rod Carew Baseball Jersey nike basketball shoes for sale in south africa divorced six months.

“Just send her to some country we get along with fine but want their oil or something,

and my ex will get a war started between us and them in fifteen minutes. air max pas cher Los Angeles Lakers Guaranteed.”

When it was pointed out that the United States has a volunteer army, Fjällräven Kånken Väska Mario Manningham Jersey Canotte Golden State Warriors Nike Air Max 90 męskie Paisley nodded. adidas uk for sale “That’s fine. Tajh Boyd – Clemson Tigers nike air max 2017 heren grijs Nike Air Max 2016 Heren wit New Balance męskie Can I volunteer her?”

Support for the decision among happily married men or those who recently got engaged was much lower.

In the poll, Cleveland Cavaliers Fjällräven Kånken Classic most respondents who favored putting women into combat cited “fairness,” or “equal rights.” Divorced men were the only group whose main reason for supporting the decision was “payback.”

Paul Guglio,